![]() His induction was a mistake, a whiff by the committee that can’t really be defended. HHOF expert Paul Pidutti makes the case against Brind’Amour here, and I agree with just about all of it.Īnd no, I’m not interested in hearing about Guy Carbonneau. Those two Selkes are impressive, but they were the only two years he ever finished in the top 10, and his name showed up on Hart ballots just once in his 20-year career. That’s great, but second-liners aren’t supposed to get into the Hall of Fame (even though a few have). Brind’Amour was a very good player with a very long career, most of it spent as the guy you wished your team had as its No. Here’s Sara Civian laying out the pro-Brind’Amour case a few years ago here’s a Hurricanes fan blog doing the same. Either way, these days people will point to a two-time Selke winner with nearly 1,200 points and wonder how he’s been left out for a decade. I suspect that his success as a coach is driving some of this it doesn’t help his case according to the HHOF rules, but it does keep him in the public eye. Since then, something changed, to the point where Brind’Amour is now often one of the very first names that come up when the discussion turns to snubs. (We have no idea whether that was also true for the committee, since they don’t tell us anything about who they discuss.) He was flying so far under the radar that I used to make a point of bringing him up in discussing other fringe candidacies, wondering why you never seemed to even hear his name. He first became eligible in 2013, and there seemed to be close to zero support for him among fans. The comment section will be super positive today, right? Cool, can’t wait, let’s do this.īrind’Amour’s candidacy has been fascinating.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |